Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Penalty lodged but container is held

11 Dec 2003 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

In the last fortnight, FTW has been inundated with complaints from members of the forwarding industry about the frequency and high cost of container examinations by customs. These are some of the problems that have been told to Alan Peat. AN EXAMPLE of the problems unfolding at customs is of a less-than container load (LCL) cargo for which the customs entry was submitted on May 6. “It was stopped for customs examination on May 8,” said the forwarder. “At first no reason was given for this stop, but a week later we got the detailed stop note stating the wrong tariff code had been used. “We were asked to lodge a provisional penalty of R1 600 - which was done. We reacted quickly and submitted literature about the products, samples were handed to customs but no examination could be done.” The shipment remains under ‘customs stop’ three months later, the forwarder added. “Customs have had samples of the toiletry product,” he said, “which they have since misplaced. A second shipment was done by us on June 4, released by customs on June 6, and the export was despatched as booked.” And the mystery about the whole thing, the forwarder added, was that the same tariff heading was used on both DA 550s. “The bottom line,” said this aggrieved forwarder, “is that the consignee - with two bad experiences - didn’t place any new orders.”

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 11 Dec 03

View PDF
Long-serving industry stalwart dies
11 Dec 2003
New freight terminal planned for JIA
11 Dec 2003
SAA Cargo facility must be integrated
11 Dec 2003
Game of gantries
11 Dec 2003
Truck ban plan for some highways
11 Dec 2003
All quiet on shipping’s crisis front
11 Dec 2003
The power(ful) arm of Compu-Clearing
11 Dec 2003
No surcharge and new equipment will be boost to CT
11 Dec 2003
MOL sets up two new posts
11 Dec 2003
‘Selective’ surcharge could prompt ship diversions
11 Dec 2003
Car-carrying giant makes EL debut
11 Dec 2003
Surcharge reprieve will help ‘marginal’ exporters
11 Dec 2003
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Botswana 20 June 2025

Border Beat

Police clamp down on cross-border crime
17 Jun 2025
Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Senior Sea/Air Import/Export Controller (Multimodal Controller) Strong on Imports

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
20 Jun

Key Account Manager

Lee Botti & Associates
Johannesburg
18 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us