Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

All three conferences agree on surcharge policy

11 Dec 2003 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

Alan Peat ALL THREE shipping conferences on the SA trade have suspended the port congestion surcharge at Port Elizabeth and Cape Town with Durban still left in their bad books. These suspensions were dated August 1 by the Europe Southern Africa Conference (ESAC), August 6 by the US Southern Africa Conference (USAC), and August 15 by the G8 Forum on the Far East trade. This follows the different dates of imposition of the US$100 per TEU (twenty foot equivalent unit) surcharge. Their congestion measuring mechanisms stated that a port must have a 16-hour average delay or below for two full, consecutive months before the surcharge can be lifted. The situation in Durban is still “serious” according to all three conferences, and that means that the port will have to bear the surcharge until an October date at the earliest. All the releases from the shipping consortia also expressed “disappointment” that “no significant improvement in productivity at SA ports has been detected”. They added that “handling productivity remains poor and continues to cause delay” and demanded improvement in this area. The lines all stated that they would continue to monitor operational performance and, “should deterioration beyond a 16-hour berthing delay (averaged over a four-week period) be detected - the lines will seek to re-impose the surcharge”. The worry now amongst port users is that delay-cutting diversions of ships or cargoes to PE and Cape Town during the peak seafreight season of the year could very well see congestion rearing its ugly head again at these ports.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 11 Dec 03

View PDF
Long-serving industry stalwart dies
11 Dec 2003
New freight terminal planned for JIA
11 Dec 2003
SAA Cargo facility must be integrated
11 Dec 2003
Game of gantries
11 Dec 2003
Truck ban plan for some highways
11 Dec 2003
All quiet on shipping’s crisis front
11 Dec 2003
The power(ful) arm of Compu-Clearing
11 Dec 2003
No surcharge and new equipment will be boost to CT
11 Dec 2003
MOL sets up two new posts
11 Dec 2003
‘Selective’ surcharge could prompt ship diversions
11 Dec 2003
Car-carrying giant makes EL debut
11 Dec 2003
Surcharge reprieve will help ‘marginal’ exporters
11 Dec 2003
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Botswana 20 June 2025

Border Beat

Police clamp down on cross-border crime
17 Jun 2025
Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Senior Sea/Air Import/Export Controller (Multimodal Controller) Strong on Imports

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
20 Jun

Key Account Manager

Lee Botti & Associates
Johannesburg
18 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us