Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Latest version of ports bill provides pleasant surprise

25 Mar 2005 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

NPA will not be left permanently
in the hands of Transnet
ALAN PEAT
THERE’S A pleasant surprise in the latest version of the National Ports Authority (NPA) Bill – currently on its path through parliament – that the NPA will not be left permanently in the hands of Transnet.
Those are the words of Tony Norton, head of Garlicke and Bousfield’s maritime section, and chairman of the National Port Users Forum (Npuf) – after his review of this latest bill.
“I am surprised that the bill has not been amended further to accommodate what I understood to be the view of Maria Ramos (CEO of Transnet) that the NPA would never be removed from the Transnet stable.
“In fact the mechanism to remove it, on my reading, remains in place. Consequently, that particular course of action remains available to a minister of public enterprises (currently Alec Erwin) should Transnet not perform as holding company of the NPA.”
What is termed the “Maydon Wharf issue” – where companies having long-standing but extremely low cost leases on harbour property can find these leases terminated – still remains in the latest bill, Norton added.
“Thus,” he said, “on balance and subject to the use and interpretation of the legislation in due course, I do not believe that the Npuf has done that badly!”

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 25 Mar 05

View PDF
Air Namibia to launch London flights
25 Mar 2005
Export uncertainties slow down Swazi economy
25 Mar 2005
SACD’s interactive website comes online
25 Mar 2005
APM Terminals gets Apapa nod
25 Mar 2005
Fuel surcharge ‘inevitable’
25 Mar 2005
Services extend beyond custom crates and pallets
25 Mar 2005
Boksburg Group takes another look at trade facilitation issues
25 Mar 2005
HIV workplace programme scoops top German award
25 Mar 2005
Star Reefers orders two vessels
25 Mar 2005
Cheesy awards
25 Mar 2005
Latest version of ports bill provides pleasant surprise
25 Mar 2005
Transnet remains mum on partnership deals
25 Mar 2005
  • More

FeatureClick to view

West Africa 13 June 2025

Border Beat

Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
BMA steps in to help DG and FMCG cargo at Groblersbrug
21 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Cross-border Controller

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
13 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us