Should ships be referred to as 'she' or 'it'?

Gender debate sets the industry alight WHEN UK-based Lloyd's List announced its intention earlier this year to refer to ships as 'it' rather than 'she' a reader revolt ensued. More letters reportedly flowed in daily on this topic than on any other, which led Safmarine to conduct its own mini-survey around the globe on why ships were referred to in the female gender and whether the change was acceptable. Cape Town-based Smersh Rabie recounts some of the typical comments of 'wharf rats' who frequent the dockside taverns: "A ship is called a 'she' because there is always a great deal of bustle around her; there is usually a gang of men about, she has a waist and stays; it takes a lot of paint to keep her good looking; and it is not the initial expense that breaks you, it is the upkeep." As to the break with tradition, he reluctantly acquiesces. In similar vein Peter Miller of Cape Town comments: "They are shapely and move well (nice superstructures); they are designed for hard work and need lots of attention." He believes that to refer to them as 'it' would be insulting. Antwerp-based Alex Daems says that in Chesapeake Bay many of the work boats were traditionally named for women. The names usually reflected the female member of the family, and while no one knows exactly where this tradition originated, a few speculate that the naming tradition reflects the waterman's connection to his family. Durban-based Arthur Rajopaul comments: "Ships will always be carriers of cargo and people. She carries and takes care of what she holds on her long or short journey, just as a mother does. This is why my vote goes for 'she'." The editor welcomes your input. Email joyo@nowmedia.co.za or fax 011 327 4094.