Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

‘Principal co-loader must be named’

24 Feb 2004 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

A LACK of adequate documentation makes it very difficult to track-and-trace the movement of co-loaded cargo, according to consultant Graham Pile. “So it’s very difficult to sort out claims,” he said.
If parties are moving high-value cargoes, it’s at risk in a co-load situation - and very difficult for insurers to work out where responsibility lies in the result of a claim.
The main problem where two or more forwarders share a box, is that there normally isn’t a principal co-loader named. “And there should be,” said Pile, “otherwise there’s no check on the completed container load, and no liable party.
“They need to work out a contract of carriage. An agreement in terms of which there’s a principal co-loader, who will carry the can if anything goes wrong.”
There’s no easy answer, but all parties agree that the problem needs to be recognised by the forwarding community - and some sort of agreement reached to lessen the problem of attributing liability in terms of a claim.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 24 Feb 04

View PDF
Specialist debates merits of rail regulator
24 Feb 2004
Maputo car terminal plans get moving
24 Feb 2004
Grindrod records 45% rise in profits
24 Feb 2004
First iron ore shipment kick-starts Matola terminal
24 Feb 2004
Far East lines confirm rate increases
24 Feb 2004
Spoornet confirms plans for second iron ore line
24 Feb 2004
GAC muscles in on Middle East
24 Feb 2004
KN rebrands USCO Logistics
24 Feb 2004
Hamburg Sud acquires Venezuelan haulier
24 Feb 2004
Fraud investigation follows forensic audit
24 Feb 2004
EMIA workshop scheduled
24 Feb 2004
Who will foot the bill?
24 Feb 2004
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Botswana 20 June 2025

Border Beat

Police clamp down on cross-border crime
17 Jun 2025
Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Senior Sea/Air Import/Export Controller (Multimodal Controller) Strong on Imports

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
20 Jun

Key Account Manager

Lee Botti & Associates
Johannesburg
18 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us