A LACK of adequate documentation makes it very difficult to track-and-trace the movement of co-loaded cargo, according to consultant Graham Pile. “So it’s very difficult to sort out claims,” he said.
If parties are moving high-value cargoes, it’s at risk in a co-load situation - and very difficult for insurers to work out where responsibility lies in the result of a claim.
The main problem where two or more forwarders share a box, is that there normally isn’t a principal co-loader named. “And there should be,” said Pile, “otherwise there’s no check on the completed container load, and no liable party.
“They need to work out a contract of carriage. An agreement in terms of which there’s a principal co-loader, who will carry the can if anything goes wrong.”
There’s no easy answer, but all parties agree that the problem needs to be recognised by the forwarding community - and some sort of agreement reached to lessen the problem of attributing liability in terms of a claim.
‘Principal co-loader must be named’
24 Feb 2004 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments
FTW - 24 Feb 04
24 Feb 2004
24 Feb 2004
24 Feb 2004
24 Feb 2004
24 Feb 2004
24 Feb 2004
24 Feb 2004
Border Beat
17 Jun 2025
30 May 2025
Poll
Featured Jobs
New