Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

‘Principal co-loader must be named’

24 Feb 2004 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

A LACK of adequate documentation makes it very difficult to track-and-trace the movement of co-loaded cargo, according to consultant Graham Pile. “So it’s very difficult to sort out claims,” he said.
If parties are moving high-value cargoes, it’s at risk in a co-load situation - and very difficult for insurers to work out where responsibility lies in the result of a claim.
The main problem where two or more forwarders share a box, is that there normally isn’t a principal co-loader named. “And there should be,” said Pile, “otherwise there’s no check on the completed container load, and no liable party.
“They need to work out a contract of carriage. An agreement in terms of which there’s a principal co-loader, who will carry the can if anything goes wrong.”
There’s no easy answer, but all parties agree that the problem needs to be recognised by the forwarding community - and some sort of agreement reached to lessen the problem of attributing liability in terms of a claim.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 24 Feb 04

View PDF
Industry considers draft legislation for SA port security
24 Feb 2004
On-line invoicing and payment move closer for Safmarine customers
24 Feb 2004
Manuel commits R6,76bn to transport infrastructure
24 Feb 2004
‘Operation Juggernaut’ nets overloaders in volume
24 Feb 2004
DoT plans to accelerate expenditure
24 Feb 2004
Zulu takes top post at RailRoad Africa
24 Feb 2004
Terminal operator denies ‘for sale’ report
24 Feb 2004
US pilots security software in southern Africa
24 Feb 2004
US export cheats face exposure on the internet
24 Feb 2004
Maputo milestone
24 Feb 2004
Durban terminal manager resigns
24 Feb 2004
Chinese and BEE consortium gets the nod for RB drydock
24 Feb 2004
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Botswana 20 June 2025

Border Beat

Police clamp down on cross-border crime
17 Jun 2025
Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Senior Sea/Air Import/Export Controller (Multimodal Controller) Strong on Imports

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
20 Jun

Key Account Manager

Lee Botti & Associates
Johannesburg
18 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us