Lines’ no-show penalties bearing fruit

A decision by shipping lines

to charge no-show fees or late

cancellation penalties has

resulted in major improvements

in cargo ‘drop-offs’ locally.

While the growing practice

among ocean freight carriers

to charge for what is often also

referred to as

deadfreight

has met some

resistance

internationally,

South African

shippers and

forwarders have

seemingly been

more accepting

of the practice

which has seen

a 50% improvement in dropoffs

in some cases.

“It’s a decision that seems

to be working at this point,”

Jonathan Horn, Maersk

managing director southern

Africa, told FTW.

He said the company

had introduced the practice

towards the end of March on

the Far East and Middle East

routes to address an issue that

was becoming of increasing

concern.

“We were seeing 20 to 30%

no shows or late cancellations

on some routes – and in

some instances on particular

voyages it was even higher,”

he said. “The crucial thing to

understand is that this is not

a fee, but a penalty. It is about

behaviour change.”

French carrier CMA CGM

and German Hapag-Lloyd

introduced the no-show or

cancellation fee recently with

both companies saying the

shortfalls

due to late

cancellations

were preventing

them from

accepting

bookings from

customers with

cargo ready

to go.

Horn said

that a 20-30%

cancellation on a voyage

severely affected a shipping

line’s ability to deliver a reliable

product, indicating that the

practice was here to stay.

Freight forwarder Mike

Walwyn said he believed as

long as shipping lines were

reasonable in this

approach they

would continue

to see improved

behaviour from

shippers and

forwarders.

“If a

shipper

has a good

reason for

missing the boat,

like a truck or a packhouse

breakdown, then I would

expect the line to waive the

charge.”

He said it was commonly

understood that shipping lines

were operating on the edge and

needed every cent of revenue

they could get. Booking cargo

with no intention of using the

service ultimately played havoc

with their schedules, revenue

and ability to deliver a service

to the rest of industry.

“Personally I would rather

they got their revenue from

legitimate charges like

deadfreight than from a

wide range of manufactured

surcharges and extortionate

mark-ups of

other service

providers’

charges,” said

Walwyn.

This is not a fee, but

a penalty. It is about

behaviour change.

– Jonathan Horn