Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Hauliers challenge Portnet monopoly

20 Sep 1996 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

By Gavin du Venage Private hauliers have called on the Competition Board to act against Portnet after it ignored demands to explain its haulage monopoly at Durban.

Chairman of the Harbour Carriers division of the KwaZulu Natal Association of Freight Forwarders, Harbour Carriers and Warehousemen, Paul Rayner, said Portnet had ignored demands to explain its continued monopoly of carrier haulage within a 110 kilometre radius of the port.

The association had applied to the Competition Board in April asking for an investigation into the monopoly which Portnet has enjoyed since the advent of containerisation in the 70s.

Rayner said private hauliers were allowed in two years ago after a strike by Portnet workers.

The system worked so well it was allowed to continue, he said. However, pressure from Portnet unions had led to the exclusive rights area being enforced once again.

Rayner said union members objected to losing over To page 16 From page 1 time work to private hauliers. However, a number of private carriers were being forced out of business because of the loss of income.

Roughly 70% of cargo traffic is containerised, which leaves us to make the best of what is left, he said.

Portnet failed to respond to a Competition Board's deadline of the end of August. Rayner said the association wanted the board to step in and end the monopoly.

We believe it is unconstitutional for Portnet to dictate to importers and exporters and tell them who they must use to deliver their goods, he said.

Rayner added that the association could take legal action to break the monopoly if it did not receive a response soon.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 20 Sep 96

View PDF
Export bureau predicts export surge
20 Sep 1996
NRZ admits it's inefficient
20 Sep 1996
20 Sep 1996
Floating billboard for CT
20 Sep 1996
One year milestone
20 Sep 1996
Accreditation rebates "retrospective"
20 Sep 1996
Fraud skews stats
20 Sep 1996
Ports' names are not suitable - King
20 Sep 1996
C&F workshop for Jo'burg
20 Sep 1996
Hauliers challenge Portnet monopoly
20 Sep 1996
Saferoute merged
20 Sep 1996
Concerned Cape shippers extend their reach
20 Sep 1996
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Botswana 20 June 2025

Border Beat

Forum tightens net against border corruption
Yesterday
Police clamp down on cross-border crime
17 Jun 2025
Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Estimator

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
26 Jun
New

Commercial Manager

Lee Botti & Associates
Durban
25 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us