Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Controversial Durban port plans seek Board approval

13 Feb 1998 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

Portnet's latest plan to extend Durban's container terminal facilities is set to be placed before the Portnet and Transnet boards on the 24th February and 6th March respectively.
This is despite strong reservations having been expressed in certain quarters over environmental and traffic flow complications that will result from dredging part of the central sandbank, and from developing deep water berthing alongside the Point.
The situation as it stands is that Portnet wants to extend the present container terminal with two additional berths, 206 and 207, by dredging a channel through the controversial central sandbank. A new quay south of berth 205 would create a much larger terminal area behind it and resolve much of Durban's container congestion problem.
A second part of the plan calls for a new combi terminal to be built at the Point, with deep-water berths. This will free-up Pier No 1 for container handling. Concerns over increased traffic flows along sensitive CBD streets, especially the Victoria Embankment, are another
area of concern.
It was reported that the Local Advisory Committee, consisting of all the main role players and established to advise Portnet, has produced a confidential report raising these concerns. One of these main role players, Durban Bay 2020, has gone on record saying that they were not consulted over the latest proposal, which they strongly oppose.
By Terry Hutson

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 13 Feb 98

View PDF
China waives customs deposits for temporary imports
13 Feb 1998
MACS takes to bird-watching
13 Feb 1998
Renfreight uses customer input to set service priorities
13 Feb 1998
Zimbabwe touts Beira Corridor as lifeline for beleaguered economy
13 Feb 1998
Controversial Durban port plans seek Board approval
13 Feb 1998
MITB turns to NZ for advice
13 Feb 1998
Roadfreight strike warning
13 Feb 1998
Customs appeals for co-operation on preclearance
13 Feb 1998
MSC backs SA's Olympic yachting effort
13 Feb 1998
SAA beats rain and snow to meet computer deadline
13 Feb 1998
Diamond adds Gulf operator to agency portfolio
13 Feb 1998
New Quay wall for Luderitz
13 Feb 1998
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Road & Rail 27 June 2025

Border Beat

Forum tightens net against border corruption
25 Jun 2025
Police clamp down on cross-border crime
17 Jun 2025
Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Sea Export Controller (In-house)

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
30 Jun
New

Export Controller

Lee Botti & Associates
Durban
30 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us