Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines
Freight & Trading Weekly

Old scanner issue irks industry

03 Aug 2018 - by Liesl Venter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

Ongoing concerns with the customs scanner at the Port of Cape Town, which has seen importers’ costs escalate, have led to industry’s decision to take the matter to the provincial red tape department. According to a spokesman for the Cape’s Port Liaison Forum (PLF), the issue around the scanner is a classic example of red tape that is effectively costing importers thousands of rands. “The scanning of a container can cost an importer anything from R10 000 to R20 000,” he said. “What makes it worse is that the challenge faced at present with the scanner was already highlighted to officials prior to its installation in 2015.” Carrier haulage remains the biggest bone of contention. Containers by law have to be transported by shipping lines until released by Customs. Industry has time and again raised concern over the inflated costs for the movement of containers by shipping lines to and from the scanner, as well as the inability to change hauliers once the container has been cleared at the scanner. If the container is on the wrong truck once it has been cleared at the scanner, “either the importer uses the shipping line to transport the container to the final destination, which is usually at a much higher rate than the average transporter would charge, or the container has to be moved to a depot where it can be picked up by another transporter,” explained the spokesman. “All of this means increased costs. If the scanner is not released it still has to be taken to the depot where it can be physically inspected.” Calls for Transnet Port Terminals (TPT) to move the containers to and from the scanner and back to the stack have been unsuccessful. “TPT is the only other entity allowed to transport uncleared containers and the transport costs would immediately be less. “Taking the boxes back to the stack would also cut out the extra depot charges,” said the spokesman, who indicated they had asked TPT to make a decision on the matter and take over the movement of containers to the stack. TPT, however, has said it is unable to move the containers. “Legally we are restricted to do it. By law we would have to be instructed by the shipping line to move the container on their behalf. Also, only once that instruction has been received will TPT be able to do a risk assessment and decide if it was in a position to take on this role,” a spokesman told FTW. “No shipping line has requested TPT to move containers to and from the scanner.” In an effort to address the escalating cost and ongoing challenge, the PLF is in the process of drafting an official letter to the province's MEC for economic opportunities, Alan Winde, requesting that the red tape reduction unit look into the matter. “It is simply not feasible or sustainable for an importer to pay up to R20 000 just to have a container scanned,” said the spokesman. “As an industry, we have to collectively come up with a solution for this ongoing problem.” 

INSERT

It's simply not feasible or sustainable for an importer to pay up to R20 000 just to have a container scanned. – PLF

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW 3 August 2018

View PDF
Forwarding and clearing in need of gov funding
03 Aug 2018
Trump, ‘twerrorism’, trade and big trouble from little legumes
03 Aug 2018
SA well placed to survive Brexit – Davies
03 Aug 2018
AfCFTA members set deadline for finalising tariff schedules
03 Aug 2018
Calls for public inquiry into sugar import ‘disaster’
03 Aug 2018
Land issue puts the brakes on investment appetite
03 Aug 2018
‘SA’s energy supply chain model must change’
03 Aug 2018
Inadequate packaging and insurance – instructive case study
03 Aug 2018
Free-trade area favours SA markets
03 Aug 2018
Compliance demands swallow up skills investment funds
03 Aug 2018
‘Special economic zones work against government’s industrialisation ambitions’
03 Aug 2018
Land expropriation could start soon – Malala
03 Aug 2018
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Botswana 20 June 2025

Border Beat

Police clamp down on cross-border crime
17 Jun 2025
Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Seafreight Export Controller (To Be based In-house)

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
19 Jun
New

Key Account Manager

Lee Botti & Associates
Johannesburg
18 Jun

Pricing Specialist

CANEI
South Africa (Remote)
17 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us