Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Naamsa rejects assertion that MIDP falls foul of WTO

22 Nov 2002 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

‘It’s about
trade
liberalisation ‘

Alan Peat
A RECENT report that the SA motor industry development programme (MIDP) could be challenged by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) is creating a mountain out of
a molehill, according to Nico Vermeulen, executive director of the National Association of Automobile Manufacturers of SA (Naamsa).
In a recent media report Ford SA c.e. Deborah Coleman was quoted as saying that foreign manufacturers - worried about losing market share to SA producers - could report this country to the WTO.
“If other countries believe they are losing business
to SA because of the MIDP,” Coleman is quoted as saying, “they could go to the WTO.
“Where would that leave the industry in SA?”
But, said Vermeulen, this could be no more than a piece of journalistic extension of the facts.
“In all the years that we have had the MIDP there has never been a complaint. Why should there be one now?”
Not that Naamsa writes off the possibility of a challenge. But, said Vermeulen, only a country can complain and only when it feels that a sector of its economy is being prejudiced.
“Our line of argument is that there’s no government hand-out.
“It only allows import duty that has already been raised to be rebated against export performance.”
The MIDP, according to Vermeulen, does everything right as far as WTO thinking is concerned.
“The WTO is all about trade liberalisation and this import/export facilitation is such.
“It encourages exports which, in turn, encourages more imports.”
The MIDP is an attempt to “exploit comparative advantage”, and he feels that the risks are “quite manageable”.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 22 Nov 02

View PDF
RailRoad offers visibility
22 Nov 2002
Warehouse system suits all applications
22 Nov 2002
IT investment translates into big savings for Spoornet
22 Nov 2002
Joint venture links agents and airlines
22 Nov 2002
New US technology helps reduce inventory
22 Nov 2002
Cargo Info Africa adds export directory
22 Nov 2002
Jacobsen’s launches new version of tariff
22 Nov 2002
Consultant offers advice on customs valuations
22 Nov 2002
‘Spoornet concessioning would be social and economic disaster’
22 Nov 2002
UK port woos local exporters
22 Nov 2002
Spoornet justifies R1.4bn IT spend
22 Nov 2002
Naamsa rejects assertion that MIDP falls foul of WTO
22 Nov 2002
  • More

FeatureClick to view

West Africa 13 June 2025

Border Beat

Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
BMA steps in to help DG and FMCG cargo at Groblersbrug
21 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Cross-border Controller

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
13 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us