Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Naamsa rejects assertion that MIDP falls foul of WTO

22 Nov 2002 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

‘It’s about
trade
liberalisation ‘

Alan Peat
A RECENT report that the SA motor industry development programme (MIDP) could be challenged by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) is creating a mountain out of
a molehill, according to Nico Vermeulen, executive director of the National Association of Automobile Manufacturers of SA (Naamsa).
In a recent media report Ford SA c.e. Deborah Coleman was quoted as saying that foreign manufacturers - worried about losing market share to SA producers - could report this country to the WTO.
“If other countries believe they are losing business
to SA because of the MIDP,” Coleman is quoted as saying, “they could go to the WTO.
“Where would that leave the industry in SA?”
But, said Vermeulen, this could be no more than a piece of journalistic extension of the facts.
“In all the years that we have had the MIDP there has never been a complaint. Why should there be one now?”
Not that Naamsa writes off the possibility of a challenge. But, said Vermeulen, only a country can complain and only when it feels that a sector of its economy is being prejudiced.
“Our line of argument is that there’s no government hand-out.
“It only allows import duty that has already been raised to be rebated against export performance.”
The MIDP, according to Vermeulen, does everything right as far as WTO thinking is concerned.
“The WTO is all about trade liberalisation and this import/export facilitation is such.
“It encourages exports which, in turn, encourages more imports.”
The MIDP is an attempt to “exploit comparative advantage”, and he feels that the risks are “quite manageable”.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 22 Nov 02

View PDF
The a-z of packing ‘dirty and damaging’ cargoes
22 Nov 2002
Competition Commission spells out port concessioning options
22 Nov 2002
PE advances haulage plan to speed in-port productivity
22 Nov 2002
Abrasives company moves to East London to avoid Gauteng road leg
22 Nov 2002
‘SA farmers must get wise to global standards’ - P&ON
22 Nov 2002
DUTY CALLS
22 Nov 2002
Spoornet gets additional funds to bolster rolling stock
22 Nov 2002
Durban wins catch-up game - for now
22 Nov 2002
  •  

FeatureClick to view

West Africa 13 June 2025

Border Beat

Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
BMA steps in to help DG and FMCG cargo at Groblersbrug
21 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

Cross-border Controller

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
13 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us