Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Annual collective congestion loss runs to millions ‘NPA must be excised from Transnet’

09 Dec 2003 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

THE 15 MAJOR container lines calling at South African harbours have suffered an estimated collective annual loss of US$223million as a result of congestion and time delays, says Tony Norton, chairman of the National Port User’s Forum. As an example, a line operating seven vessels each calling an average of 7.44 times per annum, faces the costs on a delay of 20 hours per vessel amounting to an overall $14 865 000, said. “This is, of course, for only one line. There are 26 container lines that call at South Africa. If we assume that only the 15 are affected as much by the example given, the overall figure is a conservative total loss by the lines. This only deals with container traffic, and does not take into account delays in the breakbulk and bulk trades,” he said. “The lines contend that they have in the main borne the brunt of losses due to the delays caused by port inefficiencies and, apart from the congestion surcharge, have not passed the same on to customers by way of increased freight rates.” This, he said, is the leading reason why industry, together with other players, including the Department of Transport, has been working for 14 years to have the National Ports Authority (NPA) excised from Transnet. “There is no restriction in the Bill in its current form to prevent Transnet, as the holding company of the NPA, from using the profits of that company to cross-subsidise its other business.”

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 9 Dec 03

View PDF
Pro Line targets project cargo
09 Dec 2003
Costs complicate Durban’s crucial crane contract Deadline already extended to April 2004
09 Dec 2003
State commits to transport infrastructure upgrades
09 Dec 2003
Empowerment company clinches R20-m contract
09 Dec 2003
A weightier problem for some lines than others
09 Dec 2003
Gulf Air plans SA service next year
09 Dec 2003
Durban cranes to be removed for maintenance
09 Dec 2003
Congestion deals worst blow
09 Dec 2003
US law hits food exporters
09 Dec 2003
‘Unrealistic’ BEE targets galvanise industry into action ‘Council of 10’convenes to present its case
09 Dec 2003
Dilly-dallying delays cranes Firm contract still to be signed
09 Dec 2003
Belt and braces advised on TransKalahari
09 Dec 2003
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Namibia 23 May 2025

Border Beat

BMA steps in to help DG and FMCG cargo at Groblersbrug
21 May 2025
The N4 Maputo Corridor crossing – congestion, crime and potholes
12 May 2025
Fuel-crime curbing causes tanker build-up at Moz border
08 May 2025
More
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us