Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Costs complicate Durban’s crucial crane contract Deadline already extended to April 2004

09 Dec 2003 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

Alan Peat ONLY PRESSURE on government to by-pass Transnet’s bureaucratic structure is likely to see the desperately needed ship-to-shore gantry cranes for the Durban container terminal in place as planned in 2004. That feeling has been expressed in the forwarding community after news was leaked from the Durban port liaison committee (DPLC) that the commissioning deadline had already been extended to April 2004. An FTW “Deep Throat” revealed that the contract for these cranes - coming from Italy - had not yet been signed. This first delay was a result of the sellers insisting that the cranes should be purchased “as is” from the quay. SA Port Operations (Sapo), however, had as its original plan that a single party would be responsible for a door-to-door project cargo move, FTW was told - including the dismantling and transport to their Durban destination. The meeting was told, according to our source, that this had apparently been solved with the supplier offering to supply “turn-key”. However, it is only when the entire costs are known and party liability agreed, that the contract can be finalised - but the quotes for transportation and other costs have yet to arrive, although Deep Throat indicated that they were due within days. But this delay means that the necessary civil work has not yet started - and won’t until the contracts are signed and sealed. The fear that was expressed was that the actual final commissioned cost was still an unknown factor. “It is therefore possible that there could be a cost overrun against the approved budget.” That is where the call for government to avoid Transnet’s red-tape approach to budgetary approval arose, with worries that it would cause further delays.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 9 Dec 03

View PDF
Transnet hints at second container terminal Timing will be crucial
09 Dec 2003
Crime buster will talk on shipping fraud Workshop planned for November
09 Dec 2003
Transnet makes major impact in Africa
09 Dec 2003
China threatens competitiveness of local tank container industry Major operator places order for 200
09 Dec 2003
Ship declared a crime scene
09 Dec 2003
For the record
09 Dec 2003
‘Sapo stats don’t tell the whole story’
09 Dec 2003
Restructuring talks with transport unions ‘in limbo’ Another meeting to be scheduled
09 Dec 2003
Inflation target announcement imminent
09 Dec 2003
Compliance before accreditation is crucial, says industry expert
09 Dec 2003
A RECENT reader poll
09 Dec 2003
‘Makes us more competitive’... but increases liability
09 Dec 2003
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Sea Freight May 2025

Border Beat

Fuel-crime curbing causes tanker build-up at Moz border
08 May 2025
Border police turn the tide on illegal crossings
29 Apr 2025
BMA officials arrested for enabling illegal immigration
24 Apr 2025
More

Featured Jobs

New

Transport Clerk (DBN)

Tiger Recruitment
Durban (New Germany)
09 May
New

Operations’ Coordinator

Brinks Security PTY LTD
Johannesburg
09 May
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us