Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Annual collective congestion loss runs to millions ‘NPA must be excised from Transnet’

09 Dec 2003 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

THE 15 MAJOR container lines calling at South African harbours have suffered an estimated collective annual loss of US$223million as a result of congestion and time delays, says Tony Norton, chairman of the National Port User’s Forum. As an example, a line operating seven vessels each calling an average of 7.44 times per annum, faces the costs on a delay of 20 hours per vessel amounting to an overall $14 865 000, said. “This is, of course, for only one line. There are 26 container lines that call at South Africa. If we assume that only the 15 are affected as much by the example given, the overall figure is a conservative total loss by the lines. This only deals with container traffic, and does not take into account delays in the breakbulk and bulk trades,” he said. “The lines contend that they have in the main borne the brunt of losses due to the delays caused by port inefficiencies and, apart from the congestion surcharge, have not passed the same on to customers by way of increased freight rates.” This, he said, is the leading reason why industry, together with other players, including the Department of Transport, has been working for 14 years to have the National Ports Authority (NPA) excised from Transnet. “There is no restriction in the Bill in its current form to prevent Transnet, as the holding company of the NPA, from using the profits of that company to cross-subsidise its other business.”

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 9 Dec 03

View PDF
Transnet hints at second container terminal Timing will be crucial
09 Dec 2003
Crime buster will talk on shipping fraud Workshop planned for November
09 Dec 2003
Transnet makes major impact in Africa
09 Dec 2003
China threatens competitiveness of local tank container industry Major operator places order for 200
09 Dec 2003
Ship declared a crime scene
09 Dec 2003
For the record
09 Dec 2003
‘Sapo stats don’t tell the whole story’
09 Dec 2003
Restructuring talks with transport unions ‘in limbo’ Another meeting to be scheduled
09 Dec 2003
Inflation target announcement imminent
09 Dec 2003
Compliance before accreditation is crucial, says industry expert
09 Dec 2003
A RECENT reader poll
09 Dec 2003
‘Makes us more competitive’... but increases liability
09 Dec 2003
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Botswana 20 June 2025

Border Beat

Police clamp down on cross-border crime
17 Jun 2025
Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Senior Sea/Air Import/Export Controller (Multimodal Controller) Strong on Imports

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
20 Jun

Key Account Manager

Lee Botti & Associates
Johannesburg
18 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us