Home
FacebookSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines
Economy
Imports and Exports

TRADE TENSION: Is the US going to be great again?

16 Apr 2025 - by Eugene Goddard
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

As trade relations between China and the US deteriorate amid ongoing high-stakes tariff chess, it’s necessary to keep a cool head and a close watch on what’s really happening, economist Azza Al Habsi has said.

The representative of Oman International Development and Investment Company, Ominvest, remarked that if there was any doubt that President Donald Trump was not on some sort of a tariff crusade, the so-called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs, meant to set the US economy free from trade imbalances, should have put paid to such uncertainties by now.

“He clearly wants tariffs to stay,” she wrote on social media. “It’s part of his long-term agenda.”

But Trump, frequently depicted as a bull in the China shop, is also well aware of the ramifications his trade belligerence has had on the US bond market.

“For now, Trump is getting to know the importance of the bond market. And as that happens, his tariff pushes are expected to follow the yield curve: yields up, he backs off and gives exemptions; yields down, he goes maximum trade pressure again.”

If that didn’t quite clear things up, said Al Habsi, it was worth noting that “it’s becoming more obvious that he (Trump) wants to implement them (tariffs) in a way that doesn’t destabilise financial markets, especially the US Treasury market, or trigger a 1930s-style Great Depression”.

But where does it leave China?

What has been clear from the start is that the US’s former biggest trading partner “is the real target”.

Al Habsi added that what was also clear was that China “had a playbook ready to fight back if targeted”.

“The expectation was that other countries would shift toward closer trade ties with China, especially given that tariffs on surrounding Asian countries were among the highest.”

However, the potential for this scenario to play out in a certain way, much like Eastern market dynamics did when Trump targeted China with tariffs during his first term (2017-2021), was effectively negated by the three-month reprieve on various economies.

Any potential for pro-Chinese market alliances to be formed after the “reciprocal tariffs” were announced in Washington on April 9, were made much harder by Trump’s 90-day exemption.

Complicating China’s ability to rally trade partners around, “is likely seen as the worst-case scenario”, Al Habsi said, as it meant “isolation at a time of economic fragility”.

“China is now expected to stimulate the economy even more – good for all of us.

“To put things into perspective, China now accounts for about 30% of global manufacturing output, more than the US, Japan, Germany and South Korea combined.”

Al Habsi also said that it was worth considering that, although the terms ‘near-shoring’ or ‘friend-shoring’ were probably not phrases that were part of Trump’s lexicon. He knowns the concept – sparking economic activity through domestic supply line dynamics.

Trump’s message was clear, she said: “Relocation to the US is the end goal.”

It’s been well reported, though, that near-shoring could come at significant expense to the US economy and its leading brands.

For decades, leading manufacturers, including technology giants like Apple, have favoured offshoring manufacturing to Asia due to significantly lower labour costs and established supply chain networks.

The cost advantage of manufacturing abroad has been a primary driver, making it less attractive for companies to re-shore production to the US, where labour and regulatory costs are higher. 

Even with the rise of automation and government incentives, the economics of large-scale manufacturing often remain more favourable outside the US.

The advantages of near-shoring are well documented: reduced shipping times and costs, improved oversight and quality control, and enhanced supply chain resilience.

But, despite the advantages, nearshoring does not equate to a full return of manufacturing jobs to the US.

While near-shoring may create some ancillary benefits for the US economy – such as increased demand for logistics, transportation, and certain high-value components – it does not deliver the same level of domestic job creation as true re-shoring.

In fact, comprehensive data indicates that decisions by US companies to offshore production still outnumber those opting to re-shore by a significant margin.

The US manufacturing sector has seen only modest employment gains in comparison to the scale of jobs lost to offshoring over previous decades. The complexity of the US tax code, higher wages, and regulatory burdens, continue to deter companies from fully relocating production stateside. 

Instead, nearshoring often results in jobs and investment flowing to neighbouring countries, particularly Mexico, rather than directly benefiting US workers.

Industry experts are on record for saying that, while near-shoring enhances supply-chain resilience and reduces certain risks, the fundamental cost structure remains a key consideration for multinational brands.

For companies like Apple, the price differential between manufacturing in the US and abroad remains substantial, making large-scale re-shoring unlikely in the near term.

Apple's market capitalisation plummeted by approximately $700 billion in the days immediately following the ‘Liberation Day’ tariff announcements.

This sharp decline occurred over a three- to four-day period, with the stock dropping 19% in three days and 23% over four trading days, erasing hundreds of billions in value due to fears about Apple's heavy reliance on Chinese manufacturing. 

The losses briefly reduced Apple's market cap to around $2.6 trillion. – Compiled using various news sources.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

Road rot – Viljoenskroon highlights deteriorating infrastructure

Logistics
Road/Rail Freight

It begs the question, how is Transnet going to bring about change in how we move freight? – Gavin Kelly, chief executive, RFA.

21 May 2025
0 Comments

BMA steps in to help DG and FMCG cargo at Groblersbrug

Border Beat
Road/Rail Freight

Officials said they could only assist with AEO cargo once it was in the control zone.

21 May 2025
0 Comments

Heavy lifter moves beach pavilion in feat of project logistics

Logistics

Self-propelled modular transportation ensured the building could be carried in one piece.

21 May 2025
0 Comments

Solid contracts help navigate global uncertainties

Customs
Freight & Trading Weekly
Skills & Training
Trade/Investment

“Citrus growers of the Western Cape have firsthand experience, with tariff hikes touted by the US leaving local exporters unable to compete."

21 May 2025
0 Comments

MSC acquires stake in Ukrainian logistics firm

Logistics

Medlog has bought 50% of a local intermodal logistics operator and shares in a cross-border terminal.

21 May 2025
0 Comments

Transnet and Grindrod strike R285m container deal

Logistics

The new facility will boost capacity fourfold to 200 000 TEUs per annum.

21 May 2025
0 Comments

OPINION: All eyes on Washington for US-SA bilateral negotiations

Economy

Imagine the Budget is rejected yet again, and Elon Musk whispers into Trump’s good ear: “These guys can’t even pass a national budget.”

21 May 2025
0 Comments

China imposes sweeping tariffs on US, EU, Japan and Taiwan

Imports and Exports

The newly imposed tariffs, effective immediately, vary significantly by region and company.

20 May 2025
0 Comments

Citrus exports off to a good start

Imports and Exports
Logistics

Growers have forecast a 3.6% rise in volumes for the 2025 season amid fears of US tariff hikes.

20 May 2025
0 Comments

South African chicken shortage unlikely

Imports and Exports

A ban on Brazilian chicken imports will take more than six weeks to be felt – poultry producers.

20 May 2025
0 Comments

Trump talks: Ramaphosa’s moment of trade truth beckons

Economy
20 May 2025
0 Comments

Food rescue and hunger relief outfit expands fleet

Logistics

Logistics firms have been urged to turn empty return legs into lifelines for the hungry.

20 May 2025
0 Comments
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Cold Chain Logistics 4 July 2025

Border Beat

Forum tightens net against border corruption
25 Jun 2025
Police clamp down on cross-border crime
17 Jun 2025
Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Road Logistics Pricing Specialist

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
02 Jul
New

Operations Manager

Lee Botti & Associates
Cape Town
02 Jul
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us