Port users demand reassurance on Transnet cross-subsidisation concerns

Prompt enactment of NPA Bill applauded ALAN PEAT PORT USERS have expressed support for the promise of a prompt enactment of the National Ports Authority (NPA) Bill by minister of public enterprises Alec Erwin. This is the enabling legislation for the new port management structure - although it still does not separate the port authorities from their current berth as part of the parastatal transport operation Transnet. “But, while we’re happy this is on track, we’re still terribly concerned about two things,” said Tony Norton of solicitors Garlicke and Bousfield and chairman of the National Port Users Forum (Npuf). The first is to ensure that monies paid to the NPA will be used for port infrastructure development, and not, as currently happens, being “bled off” to Transnet’s coffers. “That’s of major importance to us,” said Norton. “Prices keep rising left right and centre, but we feel that these monies are being used for other purposes apart from port development.” The second cause for complaint is the fact that the NPA Bill still has what has been termed the “Maydon Wharf clause” firmly entrenched in its content. “This is a provision that allows the authorities to cancel long-term leases of harbour land at their discretion,” Norton told FTW. But, he added, it goes further than just the Maydon Wharf operations - which, although apparently the primary target for the legislation, is not the only harbour land to which the bill refers. “It’s very loosely worded,” said Norton, “and refers to “any leases”. So, while it could also be fishing leases in Cape Town, it could basically apply to anything. “It gives the authorities the right to cancel long-term leases willy-nilly.” The other sections of the bill see the port users expressing themselves “relatively happy”. “The port regulator, for example, is on track,” said Norton, “and we’re happy enough about that. “We have also been asked to supply input to the consultants who have been contracted by the department of transport to attend to this matter.”