Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Customs EDI raises concerns over bonded cargo

10 Dec 2003 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

Difficulties could arise AS THE paperless trail becomes a reality, with Customs joining the electronic data interchange era, agents foresee potential problems. “We are delighted with the introduction of the Customs EDI system,” says managing director of Durban-based Synergy Freight, Trevor Wishart, “but an area of concern is the bonding of cargo using EDI.” He offers the following example to illustrate his point. Agent A clears cargo into a bond store, thereafter sending his customer a set of documents including the EDI Customs bill of entry. Without the knowledge of Agent A, Agent B is asked to attend to the ex bond entry using the information from the bill of entry in the client’s possession. Difficulties could occur if the bonding agent is not notified. Wishart’s concerns are: l If Agent A was relying on a lien taken against cargo under his control and release was obtained in this manner, agent A would lose his lien. l Rules of Accreditation may be breached in terms of record-keeping in the case of Agent A, who will still be reflecting the cargo as bonded. l Further complications could manifest themselves should an XRW (change of ownership) have been performed without the new owner paying the duty to Agent A or B and also have no contract with Agent A when the goods become time barred with customs. “This is an area of concern which I have raised with Customs and which should be brought to the attention of the freight industry. “My suggestion would be that bonded facilities should release cargo only upon authority from the agent who submitted the original documentation.”

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 10 Dec 03

View PDF
Cocaine smugglers bark up the wrong tree
10 Dec 2003
Duty calls
10 Dec 2003
Forensic auditors look into alleged misrelease of cargo
10 Dec 2003
A journey in three stages
10 Dec 2003
  •  

FeatureClick to view

West Africa 13 June 2025

Border Beat

Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
BMA steps in to help DG and FMCG cargo at Groblersbrug
21 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

New

Sales Manager

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
12 Jun
New

Export Controller

Lee Botti & Associates
Cape Town
11 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us