Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Annual collective congestion loss runs to millions ‘NPA must be excised from Transnet’

09 Dec 2003 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

THE 15 MAJOR container lines calling at South African harbours have suffered an estimated collective annual loss of US$223million as a result of congestion and time delays, says Tony Norton, chairman of the National Port User’s Forum. As an example, a line operating seven vessels each calling an average of 7.44 times per annum, faces the costs on a delay of 20 hours per vessel amounting to an overall $14 865 000, said. “This is, of course, for only one line. There are 26 container lines that call at South Africa. If we assume that only the 15 are affected as much by the example given, the overall figure is a conservative total loss by the lines. This only deals with container traffic, and does not take into account delays in the breakbulk and bulk trades,” he said. “The lines contend that they have in the main borne the brunt of losses due to the delays caused by port inefficiencies and, apart from the congestion surcharge, have not passed the same on to customers by way of increased freight rates.” This, he said, is the leading reason why industry, together with other players, including the Department of Transport, has been working for 14 years to have the National Ports Authority (NPA) excised from Transnet. “There is no restriction in the Bill in its current form to prevent Transnet, as the holding company of the NPA, from using the profits of that company to cross-subsidise its other business.”

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 9 Dec 03

View PDF
Ship-Shape clears up accreditation confusion
09 Dec 2003
SA hospital treats piracy victim Crime on the high seas hits home
09 Dec 2003
‘Beware of devious charter operators’ Plenty of schemes out there to defraud the unsuspecting
09 Dec 2003
Fraud expert warns against complacency Sophisticated seals often differentiate valuable cargo
09 Dec 2003
BA suspends crew over drinking allegations
09 Dec 2003
Namport begins dredging programme
09 Dec 2003
Moves afoot to address Durban delays
09 Dec 2003
Hong Kong on the wane?
09 Dec 2003
FPT commits R50m to improved quayside cooling facilities
09 Dec 2003
CT needs more trailers and cranes MOL manager speaks out as December delays loom
09 Dec 2003
Rock bottom Far East rates start climbing Rates restoration programme announced
09 Dec 2003
New UK - SA service planned over festive season
09 Dec 2003
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Namibia 23 May 2025

Border Beat

BMA steps in to help DG and FMCG cargo at Groblersbrug
21 May 2025
The N4 Maputo Corridor crossing – congestion, crime and potholes
12 May 2025
Fuel-crime curbing causes tanker build-up at Moz border
08 May 2025
More
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us