Sars spells out NCAP roll-out plans

As it embarks on a

nationwide series of

roadshows to outline

latest developments in the

implementation of the New

Customs Act Programme

(NCAP), the SA Revenue

Service (Sars) has committed

to ongoing stakeholder

engagement every step along

the journey.

Sars announced last

week that, after extensive

high-level discussions on

how best to implement

the new Customs Acts

gazetted in July 2014, it

had reconsidered its initial

approach of introducing

Registration, Licensing and

Accreditation (RLA) as a

first step and would instead

be focusing on Reporting of

Conveyancing and Goods

(RCG). This builds on the

platform created by the new

Manifest Processing System

(MPR) which was introduced

in June last year.

The operational impact of

the legislation is huge. For

the Acts to be implemented

the Rules to the Acts need to

be in place. The commentary,

engagement and drafting

process for the Customs

Control Act Rules concluded

in March this year – and

while development has

progressed, the finalised

Rules now enable Sars to

complete its technical and

process designs and engage

with trade in that regard.

“Delivering the legislation

to the operating environment

without total disruption

and with full understanding

of the trade impact is

critical,” Beyers Theron,

Executive – Customs &

Excise Centre of Excellence,

told FTW. “Those are the

practicalities that need to be

ironed out in consultation

with stakeholders before

implementation – and that’s

part of the reason for the

current roadshows.

“We want to stop the

mixed messages within the

trade environment. Although

we have progressed well

with the development of

core components required

for NCAP, the 2016 version

rules considered a significant

amount of trade inputs

and comments resulting in

changes to the anticipated

business processes and

systems functionality – so

there’s a lot of adjustment

that has to take place.

“The implementation of

the new Acts is an enormous

undertaking – and we

won’t do anything without

appropriate consultation

with trade. Every design we

have we will sit down and

engage with our stakeholders.

The current roadshows are

the introductory phase – and

implementation will come

at a pace that is absorbable

by trade and by us and we

are committed to holding

their hands throughout the

process.”

Designed to provide

an overview of what is to

come – the roadshows will

run to the end of August,

with additional trade

sessions possible in Gauteng

where the events have been

oversubscribed.

“When NCAP as a project

started, in hindsight it may

have been premature to

consider definitive timelines,”

said Theron. “If you engage

trade in a consultative

process in something as

important as legislation,

and in particular the Rules

to the Acts, you must expect

things are not going to

happen quickly – especially

if you look at the extent of

the changes emanating from

these consultations.

“Engagement on the rules

process only concluded

last year – and after the

engagements there is a period

of time during which the

drafters need to

adjust the rules.

All of which is a

lengthy process.”

What’s equally

important is that

legislation can’t

be implemented

piecemeal.

“With the new

legislation, there’s

a closure of the

1964 Act and a new

beginning – and for

us that’s a challenge

because of the size

and enormity of

what we are talking

about.”

And it’s the reason that

Sars has been looking at

ways of bringing some of

the functionality forward.

“We’ve been examining

how we can limit what

happens on the date that

the new legislation goes live,

how we can do the change

management internally and

externally and get trade used

to a new process prior to

implementation. And that’s

part of what we are sharing

on these roadshows.”

The objective is to bring

on RCG functionality

under the 1964 Act so that

stakeholders gradually align

with the new way of working.

“By bringing in elements

under the 1964 Act we can

prepare the ground for the

2014 Act,” said Theron.

“MPR was prioritised for

implementation last year

because it prepares all the

different stakeholders who

are obliged under the new

act to license and to start

getting their reports into our

system. RCG takes control

over the supply chain a step

further - and eventually,

when RLA is ready, we’ll

bring in the licensing

requirements for RCG

clients.”

RCG will be the first

work package to be

released – and while

Theron was reluctant to

give a time line, it is likely

to be next year.

He stressed however

that it was one thing for

Sars to be ready – but it

was equally important for

industry to be ready.

“If you look at the

electronic reporting

compliance to MPR

today – for seafreight it’s

just over 50% and for

air 15%. For this Act to

go live, if I can’t push up

that figure to 90-95% we

have a dilemma. With

that level of compliance

OR Tambo International

could come to a standstill

if the Sars systems are

unable to match clearances

to their respective cargo

declarations in order

to make holistic risk

assessments. It’s therefore

important that we use

MPR to raise the data

quality in the industry and

to raise the compliance.”

When MPR was

implemented, Sars gave

industry an undertaking that

if they became compliant

at an acceptable level and

maintained that for three

months they would be

permitted to go 100%

paperless in the cargo

reporting space.

According to

Theron, this was

achieved by the first

compliant cargo

reporter last month.

Once RCG

is bedded down, Sars will

move onto RLA and DPS

(Declaration Processing

System), the three streams

at the centre of the new Act.

“When it comes to DPS a

lot of development will have

to happen on the industry

side – and at some point

we will start engaging

the industry IT service

providers about the impact

of the change of declaration

processing and what they

would have to build.”

The idea is to get the

industry ready for the new

legislation. “What we are

doing is prioritising so that

the impact when we switch

on that legislation will be

minimal. For example, in

the case of RLA we will

start bringing clients on

board long before we go

live with the Act – we’ll

work with them to register,

clean their data and be

‘implementation ready’ for

the new Act whilst we in

parallel continue current

processes until switch

over.”

DPS is the final major

component to be delivered

– when DPS is ready, then

the new Act will be ready to

go live as well.

INSERT 

We won’t do anything

without appropriate

consultation with

trade. Every design

we have we will

sit down and

engage with our

stakeholders.

– Beyers Theron