Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

SA considers new dangerous goods ruling

10 May 2002 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

Alan Peat
DESPITE A number of airline threats last year to ban dangerous goods shipments from SA, only Singapore Airlines among the majors has instituted an actual embargo.
This followed a series of air consignments of undeclared dangerous goods being cited by the airline community as indications of inadequate management amongst SA exporters/forwarders when it came to shipments of hazardous cargoes.
But this shock to the system seems to have worked, according to Edward Little, executive director of the
SA Association of Freight Forwarders (SAAFF).
After a meeting with Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) officials, Little told FTW that there had been no infringement of dangerous goods regulations for four months, according to CAA records. And only the one
airline had put its threats into practice.
But Little suggests that
a possible preventative might soon be implemented in SA, following investigation by the CAA of International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) standards.
These have been put into place in both the UK and Holland, and would appear to enforce liability on the appropriate parties - the shippers/agents.
"In these two countries the shipper must sign either a red or green sticker and attach it to his airwaybill. Red for goods classified as dangerous, and green for those which are not."
The benefit here is that the shipper must affix his signature to his airwaybill sticker whether he's transporting dangerous goods or not - and motivates this responsible party to apply his mind to the contents of each consignment, according to Little.
"SA may introduce this same system in future," he said, "but the aviation authorities are still waiting for those details from the ICAO."

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 10 May 02

View PDF
Border Chamber makes history
10 May 2002
Selecting the right container makes all the difference
10 May 2002
SAAFF denounces R25 000 NPA penalty
10 May 2002
Delays continue in the Port of Cape Town
10 May 2002
New Far East service looks at strong growth
10 May 2002
DTI involves forwarders in EMIA
10 May 2002
  •  

FeatureClick to view

The Cape 16 May 2025

Border Beat

BMA steps in to help DG and FMCG cargo at Groblersbrug
Yesterday
The N4 Maputo Corridor crossing – congestion, crime and potholes
12 May 2025
Fuel-crime curbing causes tanker build-up at Moz border
08 May 2025
More

Featured Jobs

New

Clearing Controller

Lee Botti & Associates
Durban
21 May

Multimodal Controller - Sea and Air Imports and Exports (West Rand)

Tiger Recruitment
West Rand - Roodepoort
19 May
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us