Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Kevin Martin

Imports and Exports
Domestic

High cube containers – where to from here?

10 Apr 2018 - by Kevin Martin
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

From January 2019, the movement of containers exceeding a height of 4.3 metres will become illegal. High cube containers measure 2.9m, and when transported on the back of a normal transport vehicle, exceed the height of 4.3m.

The moratorium implemented in 2011 will end in 8 months’ time.

The facts are simple.

Double-decker buses have a travel height of 4.6 metres – and cargo is people so if they hit a bridge a lot of people would be decapitated. Yet a high cube hitting the same bridge is somehow worse than that?

If even one person was put into real and present danger – why the moratorium on high cubes   (official and unofficial) for over 20 years? The cost of transportation is kept down because transporters use super-links and decked tri- axles ie, breakbulk one way/container the other or vice versa.

Because of the above vehicles being used – even skeletal trailers (container only – no deck) because of the higher payloads have increased the height to 1.5-1.6 height from floor to deck/container locks over many decades.

Warehouse ramps have standardised on higher ramp heights (approximately 500 000 plus). They can use dock levels to adjust for slight height differences - but if the trailer is lower than the ramp they will have a major problem because dock levellers cannot go negative to ramp height.

We already have extremely high logistics costs when compared to other international trading nations (mainly because our production heart lies 600 kilometres away from our harbours).

The present travel height of high cubes exceeds the safe rail height when moved by rail – as a speeding train going through a tunnel may, due to centrifugal forces, snag the container corner on the tunnel wall and derail the train. Yet we do not hear the NDoT telling them to upgrade and correct – only road.

No nation can afford to upgrade all their container-carrying trailers – ANYWHERE in the world – for no valid reason.

The myth that this will increase employment somehow – and not lead to increased cost in the logistics chain – and somehow is a desirable thing to happen is a reflection of their poor grasp of reality.

The transporter cannot afford it, the clients cannot afford it, the people cannot afford it and South Africa cannot afford it.

It is a non-starter – as we have answered every one of their concerns. It’s time to take the egos out of it and end this nonsense – our country deserves better.

Kevin Martin has written a series of articles providing background facts and figures on high cubes which you will find in our Knowledge Library.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

ICFF membership – a corporate perspective

0 Comments

Ingrid du Buisson

OPINION: Why is the rand holding strong despite global uncertainty?

0 Comments

Shannon Bold

Why not declare TPT an essential service?

0 Comments

Clifford Evans

SA should begin planning its Agoa exit

0 Comments

Donald MacKay

Ignorant public sector stands in way of border congestion solutions

0 Comments

Anonymous

SA-registered vessels – revisiting an old SOC idea

0 Comments

Clifford Evans

Guarantees and the future of logistics privatisation in SA

0 Comments

Thapelo Seanego

President’s R940-billion infrastructure push hinges on maintenance and asset management to succeed

0 Comments

Bani Kgosana

State of Sars' EDI platform is a concern

0 Comments

Clifford Evans

South Africa’s ports are falling behind – and the economy will pay the price

0 Comments

Hans-Ole Madsen

OPINION: South Africa is at a critical minerals crossroad

0 Comments

Webber Wentzel

Building reliable consumer electronics logistics in a volatile state

0 Comments

Ezelda Botha

  • More

FeatureClick to view

Botswana 20 June 2025

Border Beat

Police clamp down on cross-border crime
17 Jun 2025
Zim's anti-smuggling measures delay legitimate freight operations
06 Jun 2025
Cross-border payments remain a hurdle – Masondo
30 May 2025
More

Poll

Has South Africa's ports turned the corner?

Featured Jobs

Senior Sea/Air Import/Export Controller (Multimodal Controller) Strong on Imports

Tiger Recruitment
East Rand
20 Jun
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us