Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Dangerous goods expert on call for CT industry

26 Mar 2004 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

MORE AND more companies are adopting a proactive approach to dangerous goods compliance, says Eddie Crane of EC Logistics, a 25-year veteran in the field.
But there are still far too many taking the reactive route, which can be very costly. “The cost of compliance is often far lower than the money spent on fines,” says Crane who offers a ‘one-stop’ dangerous goods service ranging from client workshops and staff training to the provision of necessary equipment for vehicles.
And this is offered on a national basis with Johannesburg-based Crane stepping on the first plane to Cape Town or wherever there is a problem to offer his expertise.
“Being a small company I can turn 360 degrees if necessary,” says Crane.
In terms of training, this is offered on site and personalised to the company’s requirements.
Crane’s compliance workshops last 4-5 hours and cover legislation that fits with the customer’s requirements.
At the time of our discussion, Crane had just completed six audits for coastal customers to determine compliance of their facilities with the Act.
“Any deviation from legislation voids insurance cover. And the implications if they get it wrong could sink them.”
A recent example to illustrate the point involved the decanting of a highly flammable product from one tanker to another. No-one was supervising the transfer. The product overflowed, seeped into the pump which then caught fire and burnt out the tanker and the premises. The insurance claim was repudiated with no payout. Plenty of reason to ensure compliance at every turn.

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

Cape Town 2004

View PDF
Meihuizen hints at another West Africa vessel
26 Mar 2004
SALLY forth, Saldanha!
26 Mar 2004
Customers score big discounts through DCL’s buying power
26 Mar 2004
New warehouse facility caters for fast moving consumer goods
26 Mar 2004
Ship repair plans enter phase 2
26 Mar 2004
Dangerous goods expert on call for CT industry
26 Mar 2004
NVOCC continues import focus
26 Mar 2004
Spectrum adds risk management focus
26 Mar 2004
Double bag handler speeds output
26 Mar 2004
Optimal utilisation of existing capacity is key focus for Maersk Sealand
26 Mar 2004
Supply and demand ratio will push up charter rates
26 Mar 2004
Expansion costs escalate
26 Mar 2004
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Namibia 23 May 2025

Border Beat

BMA steps in to help DG and FMCG cargo at Groblersbrug
21 May 2025
The N4 Maputo Corridor crossing – congestion, crime and potholes
12 May 2025
Fuel-crime curbing causes tanker build-up at Moz border
08 May 2025
More

Featured Jobs

Branch Manager (DBN)

Tiger Recruitment
Durban
22 May
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us