Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Customs

Conical Steel Drums Increase – Comment Due

Publish Date: 
28 May 2024

On 24 May 2024, the International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (ITAC) called for comment on the proposed increase in the ‘General’ rate of customs duty on conical steel drums of steel, of a capacity of 210 li or more but not exceeding 234 li, classifiable in tariff subheading 7310.10.90, from free of duty to the World Trade Organization (WTO) bound rate of 15% ad valorem, by the deletion of tariff subheading 7310.10.10 that provides for conical steel drums of a capacity of 235 li or more and the creation of a new 8-digit tariff subheading for conical steel drums of a capacity of 210 li or more, by 21 June 2024.

The application was lodged by Peninsula Drums (Pty) Ltd who reasoned that:

  • In 2012, the company applied for, and was granted, an increase in duty from free of duty to 15% ad valorem for conical steel drums with a capacity of 235 li or more.
  • It had come under increasing pressure from low-priced imports of conical steel drums in the capacity range of 210 li to 234 li, resulting in a loss of business;
  • If the loss of business on conical steel drums continues, it will have an extremely negative effect across all products supplied; and
  • Although it was aware that the requested 15% ad valorem duty will not fully address the existing price differentials, it is a good start to addressing the existing challenge.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

SA Customs Buzz

SARS’ Customs and Excise: Find a Guide

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

SARS’ Invoice Details on Customs Declarations Letter

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

Customs – Intention of the SARS Commissioner to Formally Withdraw All Concessions

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

Customs Weekly List of Unentered Goods

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

SARS’ Registration, Licensing and Accreditation: Facilities Code List Update

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

SARS’ Registration – Documentary Requirements

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

SARS’ Bonds Policy Amended

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

Tariff Review of Chapters 72 (Iron and Steel), 73 (Articles of Iron and Steel), 82 (Tools, Implements, Cutlery, Spoons and Forks, of Base Metal; Parts thereof of Base Metal), and 83 (Miscellaneous Articles of Base Metal): Comment due

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

Flat Rolled Products of Iron or Non-alloy Steel Dumping Investigation: Comment due

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

Windscreen Anti-dumping Investigation: Correction Notice

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

SARS’ Bonds Policy: Amended

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments

SARS’ Quick Reference Guide on Anti-Dumping, Countervailing, and Safeguard Duties: Amended

Customs
31 Mar 2025
0 Comments
  • More

Tariff Book (S1 P1)

Browse by Tariff Headings
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us