Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines
Freight & Trading Weekly

‘Weigh’ behind on new ruling?

29 Jan 2016 - by Alan Peat
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

With the July 1 deadline

looming ever closer, shippers

have been warned that

the compulsory container weighing

guidelines and

regulations are a lot more

complicated than most people

were thinking.

“A whole host of issues has

arisen surrounding how a

‘shipper’ can be guaranteed

to have legally declared the

‘verified gross mass (VGM)’

of his container of cargo and

complied with the demands of

the International Convention

for the Safety of Life at Sea

(Solas) Chapter vi, Part A,

regulation 2,” Peter Lamb,

zsenior associate with the

legal firm Norton Rose

Fulbright in SA, told FTW.

These complications arise

when trying to answer the

simple question: Containers

and trucks: Who must weigh

what, when and where?

First off, the definition

of the term ‘shipper’ is

“astonishingly broad” says

Lamb, suggesting it could well

include freight forwarders,

container operators,

consolidators and the like –

and not just the party with an

interest (risk or ownership) in

the containerised goods.

And, although shippers

have always had to declare

an accurate gross mass of

a container on the bill of

lading under the Merchant

Shipping Regulations, the

guidelines’ two prescribed

methods of verifying the gross

mass of a packed container

by a ‘certified process’ are

brand new. Also new is the

mandatory prohibition on

carriers not to load containers

without VGM.

You can weigh a full

container and contents

– which would require a

weighbridge. Or you can

weigh all packages, pallets,

dunnage and packing and

securing material separately

(on approved scales, for

example), and add the tare

weight of the container to the

sum.

Now, according to Lamb,

if the shipper is dealing

with ‘individual, original

sealed packages that have an

accurate mass of the packages

and cargo items clearly and

permanently marked on their

surfaces’, then the shipper will

not need to re-weigh them.

“However,” he said, “it is not

clear whether this exception

is only applicable to cargoes

and packages that have

already been weighed using a

‘certified method’.”

Another problem arises

if the shipper is dealing

with consolidated cargo.

Although the container is

packed by multiple parties or

contains cargo from multiple

parties, Lamb said that the

shipper must still obtain and

document the verified gross

mass of the fully packed

container.

Also, as in many

countries, all weighing

scales have to be certified

and calibrated in terms of

legislation. On the local

front, the SA Maritime

Safety Authority (Samsa)

– the authority responsible

for certifying

and

approving

the method

used – is in

the process

of appointing

third parties

who will

facilitate this

certification.

“But,” said

Lamb, “if

this process is not finalised

by the time the guidelines

come into force, it is most

likely that carriers will still

refuse to receive containers

that do not have a VGM

– as their insurances will

lapse if the carriers load

containers in contravention

of Solas.”

Shippers also get

involved in a selection of

road transport regulations.

“In multi-modal

transport,” Lamb told FTW,

“the shipper is not only

responsible for confirming

the weight of the container

but also the mass of the road

vehicle.”

First off, a consignor is

prohibited from offering

goods if the

vehicle is

not loaded

in terms of

the National

Road Traffic

Act (NRTA),

Regulation

330A(1).

Second,

under

Regulation

330A(4),

he is also

prohibited from concluding

the contract with the road

haulier if the vehicle is

overloaded.

Third, the consignor is

also obliged to keep a record

of the mass of every load

transported from its premises,

under Regulation 330B.

And fourth, the NRTA also

requires that he has a method

of determining the mass of a

vehicle and any axle or axle

unit of such vehicle so as to

ensure that the vehicle axle

or axles are not overloaded,

under Regulation 330B(10).

“In these circumstances,”

said Lamb, “it appears

impractical for a shipper to

rely upon the second method

of determining the gross mass

of a packed container, if he is

already burdened with having

to send the road vehicle over a

weighbridge.”

The final step in the whole

procedure is that the gross

mass of the packed container

must be communicated

in a shipping document

signed by a duly authorised

representative of the shipper.

And the penalties if a

shipper does not comply with

the guidelines?

Said Lamb: “It is

mandatory that the container

cannot be loaded on board a

vessel, with all the problems

this creates.

“In addition, any person

who contravenes the Act

will be guilty of an offence

and upon conviction

will be liable to a fine or

imprisonment for a period

not exceeding one year.”

INSERT & CAPTION

The definition of

the term ‘shipper’ is

astonishingly broad.

– Peter Lamb



 

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 29 Jan 16

View PDF
Trade with Mozambique on upward trajectory
29 Jan 2016
Improved efficiencies keep freight moving
29 Jan 2016
Zim-SA flights take off
29 Jan 2016
Zimbabwean companies urged to focus on Namibia
29 Jan 2016
Facilitating two-way trade
29 Jan 2016
Are Zim’s economic fortunes changing?
29 Jan 2016
Technology connects 'lost links' in logistics chain
29 Jan 2016
Zimbabwean intermodal park on the planning boards
29 Jan 2016
Zimbabwe to export soap into Angola, Mozambique
29 Jan 2016
Stats reveal dire state of manufacturing sector
29 Jan 2016
Power hike proposal slammed
29 Jan 2016
Zimbabwe's new indigenisation policy - smoke and mirrors?
29 Jan 2016
  • More

FeatureClick to view

Namibia 23 May 2025

Border Beat

BMA steps in to help DG and FMCG cargo at Groblersbrug
21 May 2025
The N4 Maputo Corridor crossing – congestion, crime and potholes
12 May 2025
Fuel-crime curbing causes tanker build-up at Moz border
08 May 2025
More

Featured Jobs

Branch Manager (DBN)

Tiger Recruitment
Durban
22 May

General Manager

Switch Recruit
Centurion
22 May
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us