Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

New customs procedures force agents to meet penalties

11 Dec 2003 - by Staff reporter
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

CONTAINER EXAMINATIONS by Johannesburg customs officials are hitting both import and export boxes - and a situation which is affecting even the customs-approved ‘accredited’ agents, heads the list of complaints received by FTW. The problem, according to complainants, is that just too many correctly documented boxes are being examined. The delay while the examination takes place is forcing many to fork out a penalty, just to keep their containers on schedule. “State warehouses,” said one forwarder, “where, in my opinion, such examinations should take place and at the cost of the state, have all but ceased to exist. “Now private depots have to be used, which involve substantial amounts from stops, unpacks and examinations.” The storage charges and demurrage that are having to be paid are added to the normal costs of freight. Importers are able to pass on these additional costs. “This, however, is to the detriment of the ‘man in the street’,” said one forwarder, “and to that of the economy of the country as a whole.” Exporters, however, do not always have the same opportunity, the forwarders complained. Contract deadlines are being missed; letters of credit have to be re-negotiated; payment for goods is being delayed; shipping lines are raising ‘dead-freight’ (cargo booked but not carried) and airlines are threatening the same. Added to that, the reputation of SA exporters is stained with an “unreliable” rating, with some even losing export orders. The forwarders point to the fact that customs is continually bragging about how much revenue over budget they have achieved. But, they add, this obsession with revenue collection is doing nothing for their responsibility for trade facilitation. Accreditation seems to mean nothing, FTW was told. Random and illogical stops especially on exports is the norm, claim forwarders. “And on export boxes,” said one, “where do they get their revenue from? There’s no duty or VAT, so it can only be from penalties.” But penalties for what?

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 11 Dec 03

View PDF
It’s a rooibos ruin if no rain falls
11 Dec 2003
Courier company buys into United Links
11 Dec 2003
Excellent citrus season - but competition looms
11 Dec 2003
Going deeper at East London
11 Dec 2003
Penalty lodged but container is held
11 Dec 2003
New customs procedures force agents to meet penalties
11 Dec 2003
Sea freight exports
11 Dec 2003
US company bids for container terminal
11 Dec 2003
Zero-rating comes with conditions
11 Dec 2003
Spoornet CEO commits to market-related tariffs
11 Dec 2003
Jacob Nare heads P&O Ports
11 Dec 2003
Durban begins hunt for used gantries
11 Dec 2003
  • More

FeatureClick to view

The Cape 16 May 2025

Border Beat

The N4 Maputo Corridor crossing – congestion, crime and potholes
12 May 2025
Fuel-crime curbing causes tanker build-up at Moz border
08 May 2025
Border police turn the tide on illegal crossings
29 Apr 2025
More

Featured Jobs

Seafreight Export Controller

Tiger Recruitment
Cape Town
15 May
More Jobs
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us