Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Customs

Itac Tariff Applications – Comment due

Publish Date: 
30 Aug 2016

The reduction in the “General” rate of customs duty on compounds containing an unfused triazine ring (whether or not hydrogenated) instructure: Atrazine, classifiable in tariff subheading 2933.69.30, from 10 per cent ad valorem to free of duty.

The application was lodged by Arysta LifeScience SA (Pty) Ltd who reasoned that atrazine was once manufactured by Dow AgroScience South Africa. Presumably the reason for the 10% duty protection. Currently there are no Atrazine technical manufacturers in the Southern African Customs Union (Sacu).

Comment is due by 23 September 2016.

The creation of a rebate provision on other switches, with moulded casings of plastics or other insulating material, with a current rating not exceeding 800 A, classifiable in tariff subheading 8536.50.50 for the manufacture of electric blankets classifiable in tariff subheading 6301.10. Other electrical conductors, for a voltage exceeding 80 V, not fitted with connectors, classifiable in tariff subheading 8544.49.90, for the manufacture of electric blankets classifiable in tariff subheading 6301.10.

The application was lodged by Stingray Accessory Manufacturers (Pty) Ltd which had been manufacturing electric blankets locally for the past 36 years without any trade assistance. It argued that local manufacture was faced with increasing production cost in the manufacture of electric blankets and the rebate provision would assist in lowering cost of production.

Comment is due by 23 September 2016.

The amendment of Rebate Item 320.01 through the inclusion of goods used in the manufacture of furniture products classifiable in tariff headings 94.01, 94.03 and 94.04, as follows:

3926.90.90 Fittings of plastics, for use in the manufacture of furniture classifiable in tariff headings 94.01, 9403 and mattress supports of subheading 9404.10.

4409.29.90 Wooden dowels (excluding those of bamboo), non-coniferous, for use in the manufacture of furniture classifiable in tariff headings 94.01, 94.03 and mattress supports of subheading 9404.10.

7317.00.02 Wire nails of iron or steel, with shanks pointed at one end, presented in strips, for use in the manufacture of furniture classifiable in tariff headings 94.01, 94.03 and mattress supports of subheading 9404.10.

7317.00.40 Staples of iron or steel, for use in the manufacture of furniture classifiable in tariff heading 94.01, 94.03 and mattress supports of subheading 9404.10.

8301.30.00 Locks and keys of base metal, for use in the manufacture of furniture classifiable in tariff headings 94.01, 94.03 and mattress supports of subheading 9404.10.

8302.10.00 Hinges of base metal, for use in the manufacture of furniture classifiable in tariff headings 94.01, 94.03 and mattress supports of subheading 9404.10.

8302.42.90 Base metal mountings, fittings and similar articles suitable for furniture, other, for use in the manufacture of furniture classifiable in tariff headings 94.01, 9403 and mattress supports of subheading 9404.10.

8305.20.00 Staples in strips of base metal, for use in the manufacture of furniture classifiable in tariff headings 94.01, 94.03 and mattress supports of subheading 9404.10.

The applicant Bravo Manufacturing Group (Pty) Ltd reasoned that growing input costs coupled with cash-strapped customer base was making it difficult for the local industry to manufacture furniture products on a sustainable basis. As a result, the domestic industry is faced with increasing competition vis-à-vis imports of the similar end products, and therefore reduction of input costs through a rebate of the import duties on input material will ensure that the local furniture industry remains competitive.

Comment is due by 23 September 2016.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

SA Customs Buzz

New Pneumatic Tyres Anti-dumping Correction

Customs
10 Jun 2025
0 Comments

South Africa and China Commit to Strengthening Trade Facilitation

Customs
10 Jun 2025
0 Comments

South Africa and Lesotho to Enhance Trade and Investment Amidst Shifts in Global Trade

Customs
10 Jun 2025
0 Comments

Nicaragua the 101st WTO Member to Formally Accept the Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies

Customs
10 Jun 2025
0 Comments

Refresher Workshop for Master Trainers on Customs Valuation in Southern Africa

Customs
10 Jun 2025
0 Comments

Customs Weekly List of Unentered Goods

Customs
09 Jun 2025
0 Comments

The New Pneumatic Tyres of Rubber Anti-Dumping Duty: Correction Notice

Customs
09 Jun 2025
0 Comments

General Fuel Levy Increase

Customs
09 Jun 2025
0 Comments

General Fuel Levy for Petrol and Diesel Increase

Customs
09 Jun 2025
0 Comments

WCO Regional Customs Laboratory Professionals Programme

Customs
02 Jun 2025
0 Comments

Guidelines, Rules and Conditions of ITAC’s Administrative Fees Regulations: Comment due

Customs
02 Jun 2025
0 Comments

Proposed Ban on the Importation of Blank Guns Policy Directive: Comment due

Customs
02 Jun 2025
0 Comments
  • More

Tariff Book (S1 P1)

Browse by Tariff Headings
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us