Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Customs

Conical Steel Drums Increase – Comment Due

Publish Date: 
28 May 2024

On 24 May 2024, the International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (ITAC) called for comment on the proposed increase in the ‘General’ rate of customs duty on conical steel drums of steel, of a capacity of 210 li or more but not exceeding 234 li, classifiable in tariff subheading 7310.10.90, from free of duty to the World Trade Organization (WTO) bound rate of 15% ad valorem, by the deletion of tariff subheading 7310.10.10 that provides for conical steel drums of a capacity of 235 li or more and the creation of a new 8-digit tariff subheading for conical steel drums of a capacity of 210 li or more, by 21 June 2024.

The application was lodged by Peninsula Drums (Pty) Ltd who reasoned that:

  • In 2012, the company applied for, and was granted, an increase in duty from free of duty to 15% ad valorem for conical steel drums with a capacity of 235 li or more.
  • It had come under increasing pressure from low-priced imports of conical steel drums in the capacity range of 210 li to 234 li, resulting in a loss of business;
  • If the loss of business on conical steel drums continues, it will have an extremely negative effect across all products supplied; and
  • Although it was aware that the requested 15% ad valorem duty will not fully address the existing price differentials, it is a good start to addressing the existing challenge.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

SA Customs Buzz

2025 National Budget Tips – Make Your Voice Heard

Customs
03 Feb 2025
0 Comments

Clear Float Glass Sunset Review: Comments due

Customs
03 Feb 2025
0 Comments

Lithium-ion Prohibited and Restricted Imports and Exports List Amendment

Customs
03 Feb 2025
0 Comments

What to expect from Customs in 2025

Customs
29 Jan 2025
0 Comments

Over 80% of Global Merchandise Trade is on MFN Basis

Customs
27 Jan 2025
0 Comments

WCO and WTO Sign Agreement to Boost Co-operation on Trade and Customs Matters

Customs
27 Jan 2025
0 Comments

The Container Conventions Administrative Committee’s Highlights

Customs
27 Jan 2025
0 Comments

SARS’ Registration, Licensing and Accreditation

Customs
27 Jan 2025
0 Comments

SARS’ 13th Deferment Payment at the end of the 2024/2025 Financial Year

Customs
27 Jan 2025
0 Comments

SARS’ International Customs Day 2025 Commemoration

Customs
27 Jan 2025
0 Comments

Customs Weekly List of Unentered Goods

Customs
27 Jan 2025
0 Comments

Steel Shoulder Couplers Tariff Increase: Comment due

Customs
27 Jan 2025
0 Comments
  • More

Tariff Book (S1 P1)

Browse by Tariff Headings
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us