Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Customs

Conical Steel Drums Increase – Comment Due

Publish Date: 
28 May 2024

On 24 May 2024, the International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (ITAC) called for comment on the proposed increase in the ‘General’ rate of customs duty on conical steel drums of steel, of a capacity of 210 li or more but not exceeding 234 li, classifiable in tariff subheading 7310.10.90, from free of duty to the World Trade Organization (WTO) bound rate of 15% ad valorem, by the deletion of tariff subheading 7310.10.10 that provides for conical steel drums of a capacity of 235 li or more and the creation of a new 8-digit tariff subheading for conical steel drums of a capacity of 210 li or more, by 21 June 2024.

The application was lodged by Peninsula Drums (Pty) Ltd who reasoned that:

  • In 2012, the company applied for, and was granted, an increase in duty from free of duty to 15% ad valorem for conical steel drums with a capacity of 235 li or more.
  • It had come under increasing pressure from low-priced imports of conical steel drums in the capacity range of 210 li to 234 li, resulting in a loss of business;
  • If the loss of business on conical steel drums continues, it will have an extremely negative effect across all products supplied; and
  • Although it was aware that the requested 15% ad valorem duty will not fully address the existing price differentials, it is a good start to addressing the existing challenge.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

SA Customs Buzz

Media release – Commissioner Edward Kieswetter appointed as Vice Chair of the OECD Forum on Tax Administration (FTA)

Customs
26 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Customs Weekly List of Unentered Goods

Customs
26 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Numerous Technical Tariff Amendments for Statistical Purposes – Comment due

Customs
26 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Imported Bonded Fuel Goods Rules Inserted

Customs
26 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Licensed Marine Remover and Bonded Fuel Goods Refund Item 541.01

Customs
26 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Licensed Marine Remover and Bonded Fuel Goods Refund Item 522.07

Customs
26 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Publication of Discussion Documents for Comment on Phase Two of The Carbon Tax;

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Publication of Discussion Documents for Comment on the Taxation of Alcoholic Beverages

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments

New IRENA-WTO report highlights key trade policies for renewable hydrogen and derivatives

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Relocation of the SARS Vereeniging Branch

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments

30th Session of the WCO SAFE Working Group

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments

WTO Members Address TRIPS Implementation Review & Discuss Pandemic Preparedness

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments
  • More

Tariff Book (S1 P1)

Browse by Tariff Headings
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us