Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Customs

Conical Steel Drums Increase – Comment Due

Publish Date: 
28 May 2024

On 24 May 2024, the International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (ITAC) called for comment on the proposed increase in the ‘General’ rate of customs duty on conical steel drums of steel, of a capacity of 210 li or more but not exceeding 234 li, classifiable in tariff subheading 7310.10.90, from free of duty to the World Trade Organization (WTO) bound rate of 15% ad valorem, by the deletion of tariff subheading 7310.10.10 that provides for conical steel drums of a capacity of 235 li or more and the creation of a new 8-digit tariff subheading for conical steel drums of a capacity of 210 li or more, by 21 June 2024.

The application was lodged by Peninsula Drums (Pty) Ltd who reasoned that:

  • In 2012, the company applied for, and was granted, an increase in duty from free of duty to 15% ad valorem for conical steel drums with a capacity of 235 li or more.
  • It had come under increasing pressure from low-priced imports of conical steel drums in the capacity range of 210 li to 234 li, resulting in a loss of business;
  • If the loss of business on conical steel drums continues, it will have an extremely negative effect across all products supplied; and
  • Although it was aware that the requested 15% ad valorem duty will not fully address the existing price differentials, it is a good start to addressing the existing challenge.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

SA Customs Buzz

Nominations for Director-General Closed: Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala confirmed as Sole Candidate

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Customs’ Goods Declaration – WTO Terminology Amendment

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Customs Weekly List of Unentered Goods

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments

‘List of Sealable Goods on Board Ship’ Form – Comment due

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Storage of Imported Bonded Fuel Goods Rules

Customs
19 Nov 2024
0 Comments

China Initiates Dispute Complaint Regarding EU Definitive Duties on Electric Vehicles

Customs
11 Nov 2024
0 Comments

The Philippines Launches Safeguard Investigation on Cement

Customs
11 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Plastics Pollution Dialogue Advances Discussion on Key Focus Areas Towards MC14 Outcome

Customs
11 Nov 2024
0 Comments

WTO Members Review Latest Notifications of Anti-Dumping Actions

Customs
11 Nov 2024
0 Comments

IP Teachers, Researchers – WIPO-WTO Colloquium: Application due

Customs
11 Nov 2024
0 Comments

WCO Smart Customs Project Launches 1st Domestic Study Mission on AI and ML

Customs
11 Nov 2024
0 Comments

Ensuring Responsible AI and Compliance While Driving Innovation

Customs
11 Nov 2024
0 Comments
  • More

Tariff Book (S1 P1)

Browse by Tariff Headings
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us