Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Customs

Conical Steel Drums Increase – Comment Due

Publish Date: 
28 May 2024

On 24 May 2024, the International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (ITAC) called for comment on the proposed increase in the ‘General’ rate of customs duty on conical steel drums of steel, of a capacity of 210 li or more but not exceeding 234 li, classifiable in tariff subheading 7310.10.90, from free of duty to the World Trade Organization (WTO) bound rate of 15% ad valorem, by the deletion of tariff subheading 7310.10.10 that provides for conical steel drums of a capacity of 235 li or more and the creation of a new 8-digit tariff subheading for conical steel drums of a capacity of 210 li or more, by 21 June 2024.

The application was lodged by Peninsula Drums (Pty) Ltd who reasoned that:

  • In 2012, the company applied for, and was granted, an increase in duty from free of duty to 15% ad valorem for conical steel drums with a capacity of 235 li or more.
  • It had come under increasing pressure from low-priced imports of conical steel drums in the capacity range of 210 li to 234 li, resulting in a loss of business;
  • If the loss of business on conical steel drums continues, it will have an extremely negative effect across all products supplied; and
  • Although it was aware that the requested 15% ad valorem duty will not fully address the existing price differentials, it is a good start to addressing the existing challenge.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

SA Customs Buzz

EU/UK Correction Notice: Tariff Subheading 9403.40.30

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

EU/UK Correction Notice: Tariff Subheadings 5911.90.20 and 5911.90.70

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

Used Garments Rebate Item Deleted

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

EU Launches Safeguard Investigation on Manganese and Silicon-based Alloying Elements

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

New Database on Critical Minerals Trade Launched to support Clean Energy Transition

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

VAT 404 – Guide for Vendors Published

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

ITAC is getting a New Website

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

ICC Explained: How ICC Genesis is simplifying trading under FTAs

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

WTO’s 2026 Ministerial Conference in Cameroon – Dates Fixed

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

Customs – Registration, Licensing and Accreditation (RLA)

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

Customs and Excise – Key Industry Management Forum Terms of Reference

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments

Aluminium-Copper-Magnesium-Zinc Alloys Temporary Rebate Facility: Comment due

Customs
06 Jan 2025
0 Comments
  • More

Tariff Book (S1 P1)

Browse by Tariff Headings
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us