Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Customs

Conical Steel Drums Increase – Comment Due

Publish Date: 
28 May 2024

On 24 May 2024, the International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (ITAC) called for comment on the proposed increase in the ‘General’ rate of customs duty on conical steel drums of steel, of a capacity of 210 li or more but not exceeding 234 li, classifiable in tariff subheading 7310.10.90, from free of duty to the World Trade Organization (WTO) bound rate of 15% ad valorem, by the deletion of tariff subheading 7310.10.10 that provides for conical steel drums of a capacity of 235 li or more and the creation of a new 8-digit tariff subheading for conical steel drums of a capacity of 210 li or more, by 21 June 2024.

The application was lodged by Peninsula Drums (Pty) Ltd who reasoned that:

  • In 2012, the company applied for, and was granted, an increase in duty from free of duty to 15% ad valorem for conical steel drums with a capacity of 235 li or more.
  • It had come under increasing pressure from low-priced imports of conical steel drums in the capacity range of 210 li to 234 li, resulting in a loss of business;
  • If the loss of business on conical steel drums continues, it will have an extremely negative effect across all products supplied; and
  • Although it was aware that the requested 15% ad valorem duty will not fully address the existing price differentials, it is a good start to addressing the existing challenge.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

SA Customs Buzz

WTO’s Trade Policy Review of Ukraine

Customs
03 Mar 2025
0 Comments

WHO, WIPO and WTO hold first Joint Briefing for Geneva-based Officials

Customs
03 Mar 2025
0 Comments

Nigeria goes live with its Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programme to Fast-Track Trade

Customs
03 Mar 2025
0 Comments

Prohibited and Restricted Import and Export List Amendment: Machine/Machinery Parts

Customs
03 Mar 2025
0 Comments

Customs Weekly List of Unentered Goods

Customs
03 Mar 2025
0 Comments

Active Yeast Anti-Dumping Duties Imposed for Zimbabwe

Customs
25 Feb 2025
0 Comments

General Note O to include Morocco, Burundi and Uganda as part of the AfCFTA Agreement

Customs
25 Feb 2025
0 Comments

Rules of Origin Appendix IV to Annex 2 Amendment

Customs
25 Feb 2025
0 Comments

Customs Weekly List of Unentered Goods

Customs
25 Feb 2025
0 Comments

The Philippines Launches Safeguard Investigation on Corrugating Medium

Customs
18 Feb 2025
0 Comments

WCO supports the African Private Sector with Rules of Origin Competency Development

Customs
18 Feb 2025
0 Comments

Pharmaceutical Tariff Amendments

Customs
18 Feb 2025
0 Comments
  • More

Tariff Book (S1 P1)

Browse by Tariff Headings
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us