Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Categories
    • Categories
    • Africa
    • Air Freight
    • BEE
    • Border Beat
    • COVID-19
    • Crime
    • Customs
    • Domestic
    • Duty Calls
    • Economy
    • Employment
    • Energy/Fuel
    • Events
    • Freight & Trading Weekly
    • Imports and Exports
    • Infrastructure
    • International
    • Logistics
    • Other
    • People
    • Road/Rail Freight
    • Sea Freight
    • Skills & Training
    • Social Development
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Trade/Investment
    • Webinars
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Customs

Conical Steel Drums Increase – Comment Due

Publish Date: 
28 May 2024

On 24 May 2024, the International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa (ITAC) called for comment on the proposed increase in the ‘General’ rate of customs duty on conical steel drums of steel, of a capacity of 210 li or more but not exceeding 234 li, classifiable in tariff subheading 7310.10.90, from free of duty to the World Trade Organization (WTO) bound rate of 15% ad valorem, by the deletion of tariff subheading 7310.10.10 that provides for conical steel drums of a capacity of 235 li or more and the creation of a new 8-digit tariff subheading for conical steel drums of a capacity of 210 li or more, by 21 June 2024.

The application was lodged by Peninsula Drums (Pty) Ltd who reasoned that:

  • In 2012, the company applied for, and was granted, an increase in duty from free of duty to 15% ad valorem for conical steel drums with a capacity of 235 li or more.
  • It had come under increasing pressure from low-priced imports of conical steel drums in the capacity range of 210 li to 234 li, resulting in a loss of business;
  • If the loss of business on conical steel drums continues, it will have an extremely negative effect across all products supplied; and
  • Although it was aware that the requested 15% ad valorem duty will not fully address the existing price differentials, it is a good start to addressing the existing challenge.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

SA Customs Buzz

SARS’ New Online Self-Service Features for Registration, Licensing and Accreditation (RLA)

Customs
14 Oct 2024
0 Comments

B-BBEE WTO Market Access Permits for Agricultural Products

Customs
14 Oct 2024
0 Comments

Taxpayers beware of Sars search warrants

Domestic
Other
08 Oct 2024
0 Comments

Agricultural Safeguards for SACUM-UK

Customs
08 Oct 2024
0 Comments

SACUM-UK retrospective amendments

Customs
08 Oct 2024
0 Comments

Customs Weekly List of Unentered Goods

Customs
08 Oct 2024
0 Comments

Worked and Articles of Ivory Prohibited and Restricted Export List

Customs
30 Sep 2024
0 Comments

WTO Workshop to Boost Capacity on Import Licensing and Notifications

Customs
30 Sep 2024
0 Comments

SEZ Act: Special Economic Zones Advisory Board: Nominations Invited

Customs
30 Sep 2024
0 Comments

Export Control Guidelines on the Exportation of Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Waste and Scraps: Review of the Price Preference System Guidelines : Comment due

Customs
30 Sep 2024
0 Comments

Indonesia Launches Safeguard Investigation on Polypropylene

Customs
30 Sep 2024
0 Comments

Strengthening Bilateral Customs Connectivity between Zambia and Tanzania

Customs
30 Sep 2024
0 Comments
  • More

Tariff Book (S1 P1)

Browse by Tariff Headings
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us