Home
FacebookTwitterSearchMenu
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • News
  • Features
  • Knowledge Library
  • Columns
  • Customs
  • Jobs
  • Directory
  • FX Rates
  • Contact us
    • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Send us news
    • Editorial Guidelines

Exporter offers sage advice on VAT on exports

02 May 2008 - by Alan Peat
0 Comments

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail
  • Print

IF YOU think that you don’t need to pay value-added tax (VAT) on exports, you might
have to think again, according
to Ralph Mattheus, export manager of Aspen Centralised Warehouse in Port Elizabeth.
Send it “ex works”, he told FTW, and you will get hit with the tax.
“Many people are still unaware that the SA Revenue Service (Sars) expects you
to raise VAT on exports if no documentary proof is provided that you – as the shipper
– have delivered the goods directly to a foreign customer in his country.”
It’s a result of a revision of the Sars procedure – and a 2006 rewrite of its original
“Practice Note 30”. “We noted this change
of procedure when a major client of ours in the US told us he wanted all his export
shipments sent on an “ex
works” basis,” Mattheus added. His company’s initial investigation of the VAT status
of such shipments seemed to indicate that no VAT was liable.
“Even a renowned clearing and forwarding agent replied to me on the above question
that no VAT was applicable on exports,” said Mattheus. But, while this was true in
every sense of shipping until 1998, things have changed quite a bit since then.
And it took Aspen a lengthy consultation with
the two trade and customs specialist consultant
companies, KPMG and Deloitte, to eventually uncover the latest situation on VAT on
exports. “It all depends on the
Sars definition of 'direct' and 'indirect' exports,” said Mattheus. “And Sars' latest ex works shipments – where the supplier hands over the goods to an agent, or a carrier
at an airport or seaport – as 'indirect' exports.”
The definition of 'direct' falls into the wording of the practice note as: “the
supplying vendor must – consign or deliver the
movable goods to the recipient;
at an address in an export country; and
as substantiated by documentary proof acceptable
to the Commissioner. As the supplying vendor is
in control of the export and ensures that the movable goods are exported from the Republic, this export is referred to as a 'direct export'.”
The best answer as far as Mattheus is concerned is for the supplier to ship the goods
“free carrier (FCA)”. There are other alternatives involving the co-operation
of the recipient, he added.
“But we were advised by KPMG that these were very
clumsy from a documentation point of view, and very time-consuming to get Sars to pay
a refund of the VAT.”

Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free.
Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.

FTW - 2 May 08

View PDF
For the record
02 May 2008
Skills-hungry employers meet escalating salary expectations
02 May 2008
‘Lines could drop calls if outages are applied to ports’
02 May 2008
Freight demand model helps Transnet's investment planning
02 May 2008
Time is right for rail growth’
02 May 2008
A day in the life of a truck driver …
02 May 2008
Geodis Wilson makes SA brand statement
02 May 2008
Transnet to invest R80-billion over five years
02 May 2008
BEE no longer tops SA business agenda
02 May 2008
IMO sets new deadlines for ship emissions
02 May 2008
What about the rights of other cargo interests aboard arms ship?
02 May 2008
Capespan plans JV in India
02 May 2008
  • More

FeatureClick to view

The Cape 16 May 2025

Border Beat

The N4 Maputo Corridor crossing – congestion, crime and potholes
12 May 2025
Fuel-crime curbing causes tanker build-up at Moz border
08 May 2025
Border police turn the tide on illegal crossings
29 Apr 2025
More
  • © Now Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Freight News RSS
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Send us news
  • Contact us